FRC delivers £3.3m budget saving

FRC delivers £3.3m budget saving

Audit quality review costs rocketed by almost a third but FRC makes overall budget saving

THE FRC demonstrated its budgetary prudence by coming in under budget for 2014/15, the latest annual accounts from the UK reporting watchdog reveal.

It spent £29.1m over the year, some £3.3m under its budget expectations.

However, its audit quality review costs rocketed by almost a third (30%) from £3.3m to £4.3m over the same period, driven by a beefed up team and an increase in the number of reviews it conducted as the body sought to implement the CMA recommendations following its audit market review.

The increase in core costs was partly attributed to moving offices to 125 London Wall from Aldwych House in a bid to avoid a substantial hike in rent, while staff costs at £1.6m fused with travel expenses and the financial impact of hosting the FRC’s first annual conference, were also factors.

During the year, the FRC’s revenue grew by £2.8m, but expenditure rose by more – some £3.1m. Its general reserves fell by £198,000, almost three times its budgeted figure of £65,000.

A further £300,000 was spent on legal and professional fees as part of an ongoing review of the effectiveness of its CRR and AQR activities carried out by McKinsey.

Gross expenditure on accountancy and actuarial disciplinary case costs remained static at £5.6m across both years, while recovered costs hit £2.25m in 2013/14, before almost halving to £1.15m in 2014/15.

Total revenue for 2014/15 was £28.8m against a projected budget of £32.4m.

Sir Win Bischoff, chairman of the FRC, said: “Our primary mission is to maintain an effective regulatory framework for corporate governance and reporting in the public interest; one that supports the needs of investors and supports boards and the professions in meeting the necessary high standards. We measure success by the impact we make, not by our level of activity”.

Having listened to its audience, Bischoff said there are areas where the watchdog still needs to make more progress, among them promoting “investor stewardship, clear and concise corporate reporting and the quality and value of audit”.

“We also need to avoid imposing unnecessary burdens on those we regulate, developing non-regulatory solutions wherever possible, and being particularly mindful of the needs of small growing companies.”

 

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource